Trite and uninspired? You sir, are an ignorant moron…I’m sure your work, if you can even paint beyond a Crayola level, cannot come within lightyears of the talent this artist has..nothing worse than a critic…worse than lawyers..if you can’t do, critique those who can, eh? pfft…amazing work, ignore the ingrate and keep up the good work.
I love my cat. His name is Jack, and he’s extremely sick.
Unfortunately, we don’t have near enough money to take him to the vet, and it seems like he is getting worse and worse everyday. He is always coughing and wheezing and it takes his entire diaphragm to just get in the tiny breathes he can, and I am so worried sick.
That cat is my best friend, and a huge part of the family. If any of you can donate, even just a little something, it would help out so much, and would be so greatly appreciated.
Click here to help.
Anthony Dominguez is right. And there are no words left for the man who responds to his critique with ‘you, sir, are a moron’. Sophisticated.
Maybe somebody should explain why exactly this art is somehow uninspired? First of all, the symbolism has been already used so many times, that it became a cliche (like depiction of the cross as an allusion to divinity, the threatening shadow, the shadow that appears something else than the object that casts it, etc.) Then, the subjects are rather fit for illustration purposes, than for stand-alone painting. Yes, pop art changed these delimitation, but it had a statement behind it and clever ways to adapt techniques. This artist’s technique has nothing particular and no interesting resolving. The general impression is that the artist has reached a decent level of skill, but his ideas are naive and the symbolism facile. The painting of the strange-eyed native american man is plain kitsch, and stereotypical.
People on the internet have popularized this kind of art, because it’s easy to understand and it appeals to the masses.
Perhaps the fact that i have a license in art doesn’t give me any discernment, right? Right, i’ll go back to my crayola box, trying to achieve this degree of awesomeness. And excuse my English.
I don’t agree with K, not in technicalities, but in premise. Art doesn’t have to mean anything, do anything, say anything, be anything. All who create are likening themselves to divinity. It’s people with a “license in art” who take all the soul out of everything and try to put labels onto everything. Why can’t the man just paint? Does he have to have controlling factory educated people complaining about it?
Those are some awesome drawings, great character in the faces.
I’m very fond of the first one.
i understand what the artist was going for, but i feel it comes off as trite and uninspired
great art. thanks for sharing.
Hi, Very nice art, but I was wondering, the guy sitting with a guitar in his hands, he looks a lot like Demetri Martin. Is this just my imagination?
Totally awesome site. I would love to see more! Amazing what kind of emotions arise from this fellow’s talent.
Love the art. I could hear the guys neck cracking.
Very nice work. You really capture emotion in your work.
One thing i’m curious about. Why are the childrens toys on fire(the balloons and the duck). What does that represent?
Jason
http://www.mythemefinder.com
Trite? Come on.
Great work. All the same artist? Kind of unusual to get such variation in styles from the same person.
Oh wow. These are absolutely amazing.
I really enjoy the dog portraits; they show the dog’s character and personality. Rich colors, great composition. Beautiful.
[...] Robert Carter paintings- amazing! Phirebrush- more awesome art Desktopography- great place for arty wallpapers [...]
I love your work; you paint with passion!
[...] more at & Painting by Robert Carter | The Funny Web Did you enjoy this article? If yes, then subscribe to my RSS [...]
Trite and uninspired? You sir, are an ignorant moron…I’m sure your work, if you can even paint beyond a Crayola level, cannot come within lightyears of the talent this artist has..nothing worse than a critic…worse than lawyers..if you can’t do, critique those who can, eh? pfft…amazing work, ignore the ingrate and keep up the good work.
you are an unbelievably talented artist, i adore the animation in the faces, the picture of johnny cash is breathtaking. Thank you for sharing them.
stunning. made my evening, thanks.
I love my cat. His name is Jack, and he’s extremely sick.
Unfortunately, we don’t have near enough money to take him to the vet, and it seems like he is getting worse and worse everyday. He is always coughing and wheezing and it takes his entire diaphragm to just get in the tiny breathes he can, and I am so worried sick.
That cat is my best friend, and a huge part of the family. If any of you can donate, even just a little something, it would help out so much, and would be so greatly appreciated.
Click here to help.
stunniing
now that’s what i call talent
i can truly say that this body of art is outstanding!!
Very well done, I really like the Canadian one… I’m Australian by the way.
Wolfie!
Anthony Dominguez is right. And there are no words left for the man who responds to his critique with ‘you, sir, are a moron’. Sophisticated.
Maybe somebody should explain why exactly this art is somehow uninspired? First of all, the symbolism has been already used so many times, that it became a cliche (like depiction of the cross as an allusion to divinity, the threatening shadow, the shadow that appears something else than the object that casts it, etc.) Then, the subjects are rather fit for illustration purposes, than for stand-alone painting. Yes, pop art changed these delimitation, but it had a statement behind it and clever ways to adapt techniques. This artist’s technique has nothing particular and no interesting resolving. The general impression is that the artist has reached a decent level of skill, but his ideas are naive and the symbolism facile. The painting of the strange-eyed native american man is plain kitsch, and stereotypical.
People on the internet have popularized this kind of art, because it’s easy to understand and it appeals to the masses.
Perhaps the fact that i have a license in art doesn’t give me any discernment, right? Right, i’ll go back to my crayola box, trying to achieve this degree of awesomeness. And excuse my English.
I don’t agree with K, not in technicalities, but in premise. Art doesn’t have to mean anything, do anything, say anything, be anything. All who create are likening themselves to divinity. It’s people with a “license in art” who take all the soul out of everything and try to put labels onto everything. Why can’t the man just paint? Does he have to have controlling factory educated people complaining about it?
I would love to see more! Amazing what kind of emotions arise from this fellow’s talent. amazing work, ignore the ingrate and keep up the good work.
Wow, his talent is ridiculous.
is that beaver taking over the planet?
are those canadians supposed to look like nazis?
did he really have to paint a picture of house?
yeah, well, nice job painting but it is kind of just something to stumbleover and move on with my life.
sorry not house, some other actor with a long face
Robert Carter has some skills. Serious skill that is undeniable. I can’t believe he did all of these paintings!
Cool work. Thanks for posting all of these. Robert is very talented!
Wow, these are awesome paintings. What a true talent and an inspiration. Thanks for sharing.